On narrow inner streets, the phrase “I was parked” is one of the most common statements heard after a minor accident. It sounds definitive. It sounds protective. Yet in streets like those in Köşklüçiftlik, it is often incomplete.

The core misunderstanding is simple: a stationary vehicle can still create risk.

Why Narrow Streets Change the Rules

Inner streets in Köşklüçiftlik are defined by proximity. Vehicles are parked close to one another. Lanes are visually compressed. Drivers operate with limited clearance and reduced margin for error. In this environment, risk is not generated by speed, but by distance.

A parked car narrows the usable lane. It alters the natural driving line. It forces passing vehicles closer to mirrors, doors, and body panels. The vehicle may not be moving, but it actively shapes how others move.

The Most Common “I Was Parked” Scenarios

• Door opening incidents: A door opens into the already limited passing space.

• Mirror contact: Passing vehicles clip mirrors while attempting to maintain flow.

• Side panel scrapes: Low-speed contact caused by forced proximity.

In many of these cases, the parked vehicle becomes part of the collision geometry, even without motion.

Why Fault Becomes Disputed

“I was parked” is often used as a blanket defense. However, insurance assessment looks beyond movement. It considers positioning, visibility, and contribution to risk.

Key questions include:

• Was the vehicle parked in a way that reduced safe clearance?

• Was the location consistent with street width and usage?

• Did the parked position force abnormal maneuvering?

On narrow streets, these factors matter more than whether the engine was off.

Day vs Night Effect

During daytime, “I was parked” claims often involve office parking and frequent door activity. At night, the same claim appears in residential contexts, where visibility is reduced and double parking is more common. The phrase stays the same. The risk logic changes.

One Sentence That Defines Narrow-Street Reality

On narrow streets, being stationary does not mean being neutral.

This is why claims from inner streets like Köşklüçiftlik require time-aware and location-aware evaluation. Not only what happened, but where and under what spatial pressure it happened determines responsibility.

In narrow streets, risk does not wait for motion.